"The Verdict: Acquittal in the Danushka Gunathilaka Sexual Assault Case Sends Shockwaves Through Sri Lankan Cricket"wordpress,news,SriLankancricket,sexualassaultcase,acquittal,DanushkaGunathilaka,shockwaves
"The Verdict: Acquittal in the Danushka Gunathilaka Sexual Assault Case Sends Shockwaves Through Sri Lankan Cricket"

“The Verdict: Acquittal in the Danushka Gunathilaka Sexual Assault Case Sends Shockwaves Through Sri Lankan Cricket”

4 minutes, 15 seconds Read

Cricketer Danushka Gunathilaka found not guilty of sexual intercourse without consent

Sri Lankan cricketer Danushka Gunathilaka has been found not guilty of sexual intercourse without consent following an accusation of “stealthing” a woman in Sydney. Gunathilaka, who had been in Australia for the T-20 World Cup, was arrested in November while on bail. The accused has maintained his innocence throughout the trial and expressed relief that his reputation has been restored.

The Accusation and the Trial

The case against Gunathilaka centered around the accusation that he removed a condom during intercourse without the woman’s knowledge, despite her consenting only to protected sex. The woman alleged that she did not see Gunathilaka remove the condom but discovered it on the floor after the intercourse stopped. Judge Sarah Huggett, while recognizing the complainant as an “intelligent witness,” stated that the reliability of her evidence was undermined by inconsistencies and the lack of a clear memory of the events. The judge found that there was no opportunity for the accused to remove the condom during intercourse, as it was continuous.

Evidence and Witness Testimony

The judge pointed out that the complainant gave different accounts in her two statements, with the second statement going into further detail about the issue of stealthing. Judge Huggett considered the complainant’s initial conversations with her close friends, which framed the complaint in terms of the roughness of the sexual activity. Gunathilaka’s defence counsel argued that the woman lied, gave self-serving evidence, and created a narrative that changed over time. The defence highlighted inconsistencies and implausibility in her version of events. Judge Huggett found the complainant to be a considered witness overall but noted that there were times when she appeared motivated by a desire to paint the accused in an unfavorable light.

The Judge’s Ruling

Despite the prosecutor’s allegations, Judge Huggett found that Gunathilaka’s answers during his police interview were the result of confusion, fatigue, a language barrier, and possibly memory. She formed the impression that Gunathilaka was doing his best to be truthful and assist the police. The judge ultimately ruled in favor of Gunathilaka, stating that the evidence established there was no opportunity for him to remove the condom during intercourse. Gunathilaka expressed gratitude to his legal team, manager, friends, and family for their support during the trial and stated that he is happy to have his life return to normal.

Editorial: The Complexity of Sexual Assault Cases

This case highlights the complexity of sexual assault cases, the importance of transparency, and the need for thorough investigation and consideration of evidence. While sexual assault is a grave and unacceptable crime, it is essential to ensure that justice is served based on factual evidence and a fair trial. In this case, the judge carefully evaluated the testimonies and evidence presented and found that the prosecution failed to establish the woman’s reliability and prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Gunathilaka committed the alleged act.

The concept of “stealthing” itself raises important questions surrounding consent and the boundaries of sexual activity. While it is an issue that needs further examination and discussion, it is crucial to distinguish between cases where clear evidence of non-consensual acts is present and cases where the boundaries of consent are blurred.

Advice and Support for Sexual Assault Survivors

It is important for sexual assault survivors to know that there are support services available to them. In New South Wales, organizations such as NSW Health Sexual Assault Services, NSW Sexual Violence Helpline, and NSW Victims Services provide assistance and resources. The 1800RESPECT national helpline and Bravehearts offer support specifically for survivors of sexual abuse. Additionally, the Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service and Child Protection Helpline provide assistance for those affected by sexual abuse, including children.

It is crucial for survivors to seek support, whether through friends, family, or professional services, to help them navigate the healing process. The trauma of sexual assault can have long-lasting effects, and survivors deserve access to resources that can aid in their recovery.

As a society, we must continue to prioritize the safety and well-being of survivors while ensuring that the legal process is fair and just for all parties involved. The Gunathilaka case serves as a reminder of the importance of transparent and thorough investigations, clear evidence, and informed judgments to maintain public trust in the justice system.


"The Verdict: Acquittal in the Danushka Gunathilaka Sexual Assault Case Sends Shockwaves Through Sri Lankan Cricket"
<< photo by Abdurrahim Israfilov >>
The image is for illustrative purposes only and does not depict the actual situation.

You might want to read !


Edwards Jake

G'day, I'm Jake Edwards, the man on the street. I've been crisscrossing this great country, bringing you the human stories that make Australia what it is. From interviews with local legends to the everyday Aussie battlers, I'm here to tell your stories. So let's yarn, Australia

Similar Posts