Jacinta Allan criticizes inappropriate depiction of herself in nude cartoonJacintaAllan,criticism,inappropriatedepiction,nudecartoon
Jacinta Allan criticizes inappropriate depiction of herself in nude cartoon

Jacinta Allan criticizes inappropriate depiction of herself in nude cartoon

4 minutes, 3 seconds Read

Victorian Premier Slams ‘Sexualised’ Cartoon Depicting Her in the Nude

Cartoon Depicting Jacinta Allan Draws Criticism

The Victorian Premier, Jacinta Allan, has denounced a cartoon published by the Herald Sun that depicts her in the nude, accusing the publishers of using sexualised imagery. The cartoon, drawn by Mark Knight, features a naked Allan on a fashion runway during Melbourne Fashion Week, with pixelation covering her chest and hips. It is accompanied by the caption, “From the Commonwealth Games cancellation collection… the premier’s new clothes,” in a play on the famous fable “The Emperor’s New Clothes” by Hans Christian Andersen.

Allan expressed her disappointment and pointed out that she could not recall any male politicians being depicted in the same manner. She stated, “It’s 2023. It’s pretty reasonable to expect that the Herald Sun in-house cartoonist should be able to draw women without using sexualised imagery.”

Knight, a Walkley Award-winning cartoonist, defended his work, claiming that it was not sexualised and that he had also drawn male politicians such as federal Opposition Leader Peter Dutton and former prime minister Tony Abbott without their clothes on. He explained that the idea for the cartoon came about because of the information that had emerged regarding the cancellation of the Commonwealth Games. Knight argued that the cartoon was a response to the Premier being “a little bit exposed” due to the revelations.

The Tradition of Satirical Cartoons

This is not the first instance of a satirical cartoon using nudity to mock public figures. Over the years, similar depictions have been employed in newspapers to satirize world leaders like Donald Trump and Boris Johnson. Knight’s cartoon drew inspiration from the cautionary tale by Andersen, which was first published in 1837. The story revolves around an emperor who is duped into buying an imaginary suit that can only be seen by wise individuals. The townsfolk, fearing challenging authority or appearing foolish, maintain the illusion.

The Debate over the Cartoon

The cartoon of Jacinta Allan has sparked a debate among political commentators and members of parliament. Liberal MP Georgie Crozier, leader of the opposition in the state’s upper house, defended the cartoon, dismissing the criticism as a distraction. However, the Liberals’ education spokeswoman, Jess Wilson, expressed disappointment, stating that the portrayal was in poor taste and urging a focus on policy issues.

Former Labor premier Steve Bracks condemned the cartoon, asserting that the treatment Allan received was “awful” and “sexualised.” Many of Allan’s parliamentary colleagues also expressed support for her, with Mordialloc MP Tim Richardson describing the cartoon as creepy and sexualised, and crossbench MP Georgie Purcell underscoring that sexism in politics harms democracy and all citizens.

Editorial and Advice

The controversy surrounding the cartoon of Jacinta Allan raises important questions about the portrayal of public figures and the use of sexualized imagery in political satire. Although political cartoons have a long tradition of employing exaggeration and satire to convey messages, crossing the line into objectification and sexism undermines the principles of respectful political discourse. Print media organizations, like the Herald Sun, should be vigilant in ensuring that their cartoons do not perpetuate harmful stereotypes or degrade public figures based on their gender.

Political cartoonists, like Mark Knight, play a crucial role in democratic societies by offering unique perspectives and critiquing those in power. However, it is important for cartoonists to consider the potential consequences of their work and the impact it may have on public discourse. The use of sexualized imagery in political cartoons can distract from the core issues and undermine the legitimacy of political criticism. Instead, satirical cartoons should focus on highlighting policy differences and challenging the actions and decisions of political leaders.

Furthermore, society as a whole should be mindful of the language and imagery used in political discussions. Sexism in politics is not limited to cartoons but permeates various facets of public life. By continually challenging and addressing instances of sexism and discrimination, we can strive for a more equitable and inclusive political landscape.

In conclusion, the cartoon depicting Jacinta Allan in the nude has ignited a debate about the boundaries of political satire and the use of sexualized imagery. While political cartoons serve an important function in critiquing those in power, it is crucial to maintain respect and avoid perpetuating harmful stereotypes. By promoting a culture of respect and inclusivity, we can create a more constructive and equitable political environment.


Jacinta Allan criticizes inappropriate depiction of herself in nude cartoon
<< photo by Anna Shvets >>
The image is for illustrative purposes only and does not depict the actual situation.

You might want to read !


read Lachlan

How ya going, Australia? Lachlan Reed here, your resident weatherman. I've been deciphering the Aussie skies for the better part of 20 years. From scorchers to drizzlers, I've got you covered. Don't forget your sunnies or brollies when you step out!

Similar Posts